- The Opening Print
- Posts
- Citadel: Surprise Rate Hike Coming
Citadel: Surprise Rate Hike Coming
Follow @MrTopStep on Twitter and please share if you find our work valuable!
Let’s face it: In October 2025, there was talk of an AI/tech bubble. During that time, the Nasdaq fell roughly 8%, and the S&P fell more than 4% as the market intensely scrutinized high technology valuations, corporate capital expenditures, and circular financing structures.
The core drivers back then were circular financing and debt concerns raised by JPMorgan and the Bank of England, which highlighted the risks of hyperscalers, chipmakers, and AI startups taking on debt or using vendor-financing deals to fund data-center capacity.
There were also a lot of comparisons to the 1999–2000 tech bubble, with the S&P 500’s forward price-to-earnings ratio stretching above 23x, the Shiller P/E metric exceeding key historical thresholds, and capital expenditures coming under increased scrutiny.
No, I did not take this from any news story. I remember saying there was no AI or tech bubble back then, when major hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Meta, and Oracle were going to spend $750 billion on AI infrastructure capital expenditures.
The S&P then rallied 16%, and the Nasdaq rallied 20% into their May 2026 highs.
The weird thing about this is that it’s kind of a “Back to the Future” type of thing. If you go back to 07/28/25, the ES opened at 7450.00, while the NQU25 opened at 23520.00. Yesterday, the NQU26 opened at 28500.00.
If you’re wondering what I’m trying to say, at exactly this time last year, the ES was trading at or near the same price, while the NQ is 3000 points higher than it was at this time last year.
I don’t know if that makes any sense, but the all-time high for the NQU on June 3, 2026, was 31100.00—only 2600 points above Monday’s open, despite all the selling we have seen.
I guess you can look at it in two ways:
The NQ is still way above where it was at this time last year.
The NQ is in a big downdraft and potentially has a lot more room on the downside to bring it back to where it was at this time last year.
Also, while ZBU bond futures have fallen, they opened on 07/28/25 at 113-14, made a low for the year at 109-20, and settled yesterday at 110-09.
I’m not sure this all makes sense, but how bad is it, really?
7405 ES Line in the Sand
Today, there are five economic reports, with the Consumer Confidence number at the top of the list. It’s also Day 1 of the Fed’s two-day meeting.
The top four companies reporting by market capitalization are Coca-Cola Company ($KO) at approximately $355 billion, Boeing ($BA) between approximately $165 billion and $182 billion, S&P Global ($SPGI) at approximately $126 billion, and United Parcel Service ($UPS) at approximately $96 billion.
Our lean: I don’t want to say that I don’t know what the ES and NQ are going to do, but in most cases, after a big letdown, the markets rally on Globex, and if they gap higher, they get sold. If you want to see a rally, it’s better for it to come from a gap-down open, but even then, the rallies are suspect at best.
Our Lean — Danny’s Trade (Premium only)
Citadel Securities Sees Warsh Delivering Surprise Fed Rate Hike
Ye Xie
Mon, July 27, 2026, at 5:42 PM EDT · 2 min read
(Bloomberg) — Citadel Securities expects the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates this week—a surprise move strengthening Chairman Kevin Warsh’s credibility in the battle with inflation.
A quarter-point increase on Wednesday would reinforce Warsh’s repeated pledge to restore price stability while showing policymakers no longer rely on signaling every policy move well in advance, Frank Flight, the firm’s head of macro strategy, wrote in a note.
“The market may once again be underestimating the extent of the hawkish shift at the Fed,” Flight said. A hike this week “would emphatically end the forward guidance era” while underscoring the Fed’s independence, he said.
Interest-rate swaps imply about a 40% chance of a quarter-point increase on Wednesday, an unusually high degree of uncertainty so close to a Fed decision by the standards of recent years. Traders are fully pricing in a rate hike by September.
A move this week would have a greater impact than waiting until September because it would reshape expectations about how the Fed responds to inflation, according to Flight.
While the recent softer payroll and inflation data initially reduced the perceived likelihood of a July move, Flight argued those reports should not outweigh broader evidence that inflation risks remain elevated and the labor market is stable.
Meanwhile, the geopolitical backdrop in the Middle East remains volatile, with oil prices sinking on Monday as the US paused daily strikes against Iran. Despite the recent easing in tensions, prices are still up about 20% this month as the Iran-backed Houthis threaten Saudi exports from the Red Sea.
The energy price increases in recent weeks may tip the balance toward a hike, he added.
In addition to supporting the central bank’s inflation-fighting credibility, a surprise increase would influence businesses’ pricing decisions and workers’ wage demands before inflation becomes more entrenched, potentially reducing the amount of tightening needed later, he said.
The ES gapped sharply higher on Sunday night, traded in a 7504.25 to 7524.75 range, traded 7407.50 at the close of the globex session.
After the open, the ES sold off down to 7498.00 and rallied 16 points up to 7514.00 before selling off 91 points down to 7423.00 at 10:36. It then rallied 38.75 points up to 7461.75 at 11:00 and sold off 40.50 points down to a new low at 7421.25 at 11:25. From there, it rallied 24 points up to 7445.25 before pulling back to a higher low at 7426.75 at 12:15.
The ES then rallied 128.50 points up to 7555.25 at 12:30. It sold off 139 points down to new lows at 7416.25 at 1:20, then rallied up to 7437.50 at 2:00. The ES pulled back to a higher low at 7424.00 at 2:30. It then rallied 31.75 points up to 7455.75 at 3:24 before pulling back to 7444.50 at 3:47. It traded 7449.25 as the 3:50 cash imbalance showed $1.4 billion to buy and traded 7449.25 on the cash close.
After 4:00, the ES sold off down to 7443.75 and settled at 7453.50, up 6 points, or +0.08%. The NQ settled at 28210.00, down 72.25 points, or -0.26%; the YM settled at 52431.00, up 49 points, or +0.09%; and the RTY settled at 2960.80, up 19.50 points, or +0.66% on the day.
In the end, I was right. The ES and the NQ did rally, but the gap-up and talk of AI outflows and liquidation showed up immediately on the open. In terms of the ES’s overall tone, both the ES and NQ were under selling pressure most of the day. In terms of the ES’s overall trade, volume was steady at 1.39 million contracts traded.
In addition to the laundry list the markets are facing this week, there is one thing I didn’t mention that has been an ongoing problem that seems to be getting worse. The AI sector is currently undergoing a massive financial reckoning, with unprecedented capital spending that has triggered massive market outflows, while runaway hardware costs and unmanaged employee token usage have driven widespread enterprise cost overruns.
I could have taken a story off the internet, but I asked Gemini what was going on, and it spit this out:
AI: “The Good, the Bad and the UGLY”
Understanding the Massive Capital Outflows
Wall Street’s patience with the “AI thesis” is wearing thin as massive capital expenditure (CapEx) begins to aggressively cannibalize corporate cash flow. [1, 2]
The $900 Billion Tech Wipeout: Investors wiped nearly $890 billion from the market value of the “Magnificent Seven” tech giants in a single week. This massive capital outflow was triggered by concerns that AI infrastructure spending has become a bottomless pit. [1, 2]
Negative Free Cash Flow: Industry giants like Alphabet and Tesla reported negative free cash flow due to soaring AI infrastructure and data center costs—the first negative print for Alphabet since 2004. Similar cash-flow pressure is actively mounting on Meta and Amazon. [1]
Macro Equity Outflows: Driven by these disappointing cash burns, U.S. equity funds recorded a sharp $7.34 billion net outflow in late July as growth investors aggressively pulled back ahead of broader tech earnings. [1]
The Asset-Heavy Trap: Big Tech is losing its status as a high-margin, “asset-light” software platform. The industry is spending an estimated $1.57 of additional investment for every $1 of new cash flow generated, forcing a transition to a heavily commoditized, asset-heavy industrial model. [1]
Analyzing Enterprise Cost Overruns
Away from Wall Street, the companies actually implementing AI software are facing an operational budgeting crisis. [1]
The 68% Budget Blowout: According to a data report from WitnessAI, 68% of U.S. companies have run over budget on their artificial intelligence initiatives. Even worse, only 9% have managed to produce a measurable financial return. [1]
Uncapped Token Maxing: Companies are suffering from catastrophic cloud bills due to a lack of governance. For instance, Uber blew through its entire annual AI budget in just four months due to heavy developer adoption, while another enterprise accidentally racked up a $500 million bill in a single month because it failed to place usage caps on employee licenses. [1, 2, 3]
Surgically Inflated Hardware Costs: The underlying infrastructure is simply costing more than planned. High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) shortages and customized server requirements have nearly doubled the cost per server rack for data center deployments. [1]
The “AI Debt” Retention Trap: Unlike traditional technical debt, AI models decay rapidly. Companies are realizing that ongoing maintenance, data pipeline updates, and model retraining costs are adding an unplanned 15% to 30% premium annually to the initial build price. [1, 2]
Tracking the Stalled Infrastructure Buildout
Because of escalating costs and local pushback, the physical buildout of AI is hitting structural walls. [1, 2]
Metric / Issue | Current 2026 Impact | Market Consequence |
|---|---|---|
Project Backlog | Over 60% of data centers slated for 2027 have not broken ground. | Massive deceleration in planned compute deployment. |
Local Opposition | $130 billion worth of data center projects stalled or were rejected in Q1 alone. | Extreme local backlash over energy-grid strain and water consumption. |
Supply Bottlenecks | Severe shortages in transformers, skilled labor, and combustion turbines. | Project delays and immediate 35% to 50% infrastructure cost overruns. |
Project Cancellations | Gartner projects that 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by 2027. | Buyers are backing away due to “agent washing” and a lack of actual ROI. |
Market-on-Close Recap
The MOC opened with a $1.448 billion buy imbalance, supported by $3.774 billion to buy against $2.326 billion to sell. The dollar lean was +61.9%, while the symbol lean was only +50.4%, with 347 stocks for sale and 341 to buy. That combination showed meaningful buying by dollar value, but nearly neutral participation underneath, making the opening more rotational than a true market-wide buy program.
The buy imbalance initially strengthened, reaching $1.814 billion at 15:53 as buy orders climbed above $4.0 billion. The tone then changed quickly. The imbalance fell to $459 million at 15:54, flipped to a $251 million sell at 15:55, and expanded to a session-high $1.415 billion sell at 15:57. Selling eased into the bell, with the market returning to a small $139 million buy at 15:59 and finishing at just $42 million to buy at 16:00.
Sector activity was strongest in Information Technology, which finished with a $611.8 million buy imbalance and a +66.7% dollar lean, indicating wholesale buying despite a -53.2% symbol lean. Consumer Staples posted a $239.9 million buy with an especially strong +80.1% dollar lean, while Consumer Discretionary registered $270.8 million at +78.2%. Industrials also showed broad institutional demand, totaling $245.5 million with a +68.1% lean.
Communication Services was mixed, showing a $36.9 million buy by dollars but a notable -70.0% symbol lean. Energy displayed a wholesale symbol sell at -80.0%, while Real Estate leaned toward selling at -65.7%.
Leading buy imbalances included NVDA at $336.9 million, AMZN at $202.3 million, SNDK at $131.6 million, MPC at $128.3 million, COST at $116.7 million, and FTNT at $115.4 million. The largest sells included MU at $102.1 million, BRK.B at $94.6 million, GOOGL at $89.1 million, AVGO at $84.4 million, MSFT at $76.4 million, and WFC at $55.3 million.
Daily Market Recap 📊
For Monday, July 27, 2026
NYSE Breadth: 69% Upside Volume
Nasdaq Breadth: 61% Upside Volume
Total Breadth: 62% Upside Volume
NYSE Advance/Decline: 63% Advance
Nasdaq Advance/Decline: 62% Advance
Total Advance/Decline: 62% Advance
NYSE New Highs/New Lows: 109 / 52
Nasdaq New Highs/New Lows: 151 / 230
NYSE TRIN: 0.65
Nasdaq TRIN: 1.02
Weekly Breadth Data 📈
For Week Ending Friday, July 24, 2026
NYSE Breadth: 47% Upside Volume
Nasdaq Breadth: 46% Upside Volume
Total Breadth: 47% Upside Volume
NYSE Advance/Decline: 41% Advance
Nasdaq Advance/Decline: 34% Advance
Total Advance/Decline: 36% Advance
NYSE New Highs/New Lows: 175 / 212
Nasdaq New Highs/New Lows: 271 / 633
NYSE TRIN: 0.75
Nasdaq TRIN: 0.59
ES & NQ Levels (Premium only)
BTS Levels are an OP Premium Feature.
Polaris Trading Group Summary - Monday, July 27, 2026
The session began with strong overnight bullish momentum and several successful morning trade opportunities, including a fulfilled upside target, a completed gap fill, and a premium short that reached its second target. However, market control shifted to sellers late in the day, leaving ES near key support and closing in a weaker position heading into Cycle Day 3.
Overnight and Early Session
ES began the day with a strong bullish tone.
The key 7480 Line in the Sand held overnight.
Buyers pushed price toward the pre-RTH target near 7525.
David noted that continued momentum could open the door to 7550–7565.
Morning Trade Activity
David began scaling into an A4 long.
A room member identified and executed a classic BLT setup near 7450.
The trade reinforced the value of:
Watching premium and discount signals.
Marking important horizontal levels.
Looking for contrarian entries at structured locations.
Gap Fill and Premium Short
David identified 7509 as the trigger that would place the gap fill in play.
Price tagged the level and completed the gap fill.
A premium short performed well and reached its second target.
David then defined the active trading sandbox as approximately:
7510–7530
With some flexibility above and below the range.
Afternoon Shift in Market Control
The bullish tone weakened significantly later in the session.
By the final hour, David noted that the bulls had lost control.
Bulls needed to reclaim the 7495–7498 zone to improve their position.
Price retested the Cycle Day 1 low near 7473.
The broader 7470–7480 area remained an important support zone.
Closing Action
David warned that repeatedly testing support can weaken it.
A level that holds several times can eventually become a “has-been.”
The market-on-close imbalance showed approximately:
$4.8 billion to sell
Heavy concentration in technology stocks.
Prices closed in the lower quartile of Cycle Day 2.
This left bulls in a difficult position heading into Cycle Day 3.
Positive Trades and Calls
7480 support held overnight.
The 7525 upside target was fulfilled before RTH.
The BLT setup produced a successful room trade.
David correctly anticipated the gap fill after 7509 was tagged.
The premium short reached its second target.
The 7510–7530 sandbox provided a useful framework for the midday session.
Lessons Learned
Strong overnight momentum does not guarantee a bullish close.
Market control can change quickly during the session.
Premium and discount signals are most useful when combined with:
Key price levels.
Established setups.
Disciplined risk management.
Repeated tests can weaken support or resistance.
Defined trading zones help prevent emotional chasing.
Large closing imbalances can strongly influence late-day price action.
Overall Takeaway
The day began with bullish momentum and several accurate calls.
The morning produced the best trade opportunities.
Sellers took control late in the session.
The weak close suggested that bulls could face additional pressure during Cycle Day 3.
Discovery Trading Group Room Preview – Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Market Tone
S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures are stabilizing after a sharp, tech-led selloff.
Sentiment remains fragile as weakness in semiconductors spreads into the broader market.
Traders are questioning whether aggressive AI spending will generate sufficient near-term returns.
Tech-heavy indices remain highly sensitive to headlines from chipmakers, cloud providers, and hyperscalers.
Key Macro Drivers
The U.S. dollar has reached a one-month high as markets reassess the possibility of another Fed rate hike.
Higher rate expectations are tightening financial conditions and pressuring equities, commodities, and other risk assets.
Crude oil remains near one-month highs, keeping inflation concerns elevated.
Continued strength in oil could complicate the Fed’s ability to ease policy and weigh on consumer-sensitive sectors.
Economic Calendar
8:15 a.m. ET: ADP Weekly Employment Change
8:30 a.m. ET: Goods Trade Balance and Wholesale Inventories
9:00 a.m. ET: HPI and S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-20 HPI
10:00 a.m. ET: Consumer Confidence and Richmond Manufacturing Index
The FOMC decision is scheduled for Wednesday afternoon.
Earnings Focus
Microsoft and Meta report Wednesday after the close.
Apple and Amazon report Thursday after the close.
Investors will focus closely on:
AI spending plans
Cloud demand
Capital discipline
AI monetization
With tech leadership under pressure, any earnings surprise could trigger broad index volatility.
Volatility and Positioning
ES volatility remains moderately elevated.
The five-day average daily range increased to 90.25 points, up from 83.75 points on Friday.
Whale positioning is leaning bullish into the U.S. open.
Overnight large-trader volume remains light, limiting conviction.
Key ES Levels
Primary support: 7425–7428
This trendline held multiple tests Monday and marked the session low.
Secondary support: 7147–7152
Near-term resistance: 7531.75
The 50-day moving average capped Monday’s high and remains in range for another test.
Higher resistance: 7619–7624
Bottom Line
The market remains driven by three main themes:
The widening semiconductor selloff
Uncertainty around the Fed’s rate path
Oil-driven inflation risk
Expect headline-driven price action and elevated volatility until mega-cap earnings provide clearer direction.
